AMD Radeon R9 390X – Other Things to Consider. The Fury X wasn’t available with board partner modifications. However, the R9 390X is a more conventional card that’s ripe for tweaking so.
Результаты тестов (benchmark) видокарты Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M295X 4GB. Performance is Comparable to the desktop Radeon R9 280. Therefore, even GeForce GTX 970M is still faster. The Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition is a mobile graphics chip by AMD, launched in May 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Amethyst graphics processor, in its Amethyst XT variant, the chip supports DirectX 12. This ensures that all modern games will run on Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition. Radeon ReLive updates are compatible with: AMD Radeon™ Graphics Core Next-based Products. Supports: Windows® 7/10; Radeon Chill updates are compatible with Radeon™ consumer graphics products in supported DirectX®9, DirectX®11, DirectX®12 and Vulkan games for Windows®7/10. AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mobile Graphics. AMD Radeon R9 M395X. Radeon 300 Mobile Series27.
Оценка производительности видеокарты Radeon R9 M395X в различных тестах
Bitcoin Mining
Поддержка функции распознавания лица
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0)
Тест по Ocean Surface Simulation
Amd Radeon R9 M395x Driver Update Mac
Тест Particle Simulation
Amd Radeon R9 M395x 4096 Mb
Тест PassMark
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5)
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
Video Composition тест
Результаты тестов видокарты Radeon R9 M395X
Оценка производительности видеокарты Radeon R9 M395X в различных тестах
Производительность при вычислениях
Производительность графического процессора (GPU)
Уровень шума и энергопотребление
Производительность на ватт потребляемой энергии
Спецификация видокарты Radeon R9 M395X
Подробный перечень характеристик и параметров устройства
Графический процессор (GPU)
Объем видеопамяти
Уровень шума и энергопотребление
Производительность
Другие видеокарты
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
AMD Radeon R9 M395X |
| ||||||
More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,536 | 512 more shading units | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 96 | 32 more texture mapping units | ||
| ||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,038 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | ||
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 12,562 | vs | 8,656 | More than 45% better 3DMark06 score | ||
Better PassMark score | 5,711 | vs | 5,184 | More than 10% better PassMark score | ||
Significantly higher pixel rate | 66.4 GPixel/s | vs | 23.14 GPixel/s | More than 2.8x higher pixel rate | ||
Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | ||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,460 | vs | 2,310 | Around 50% better PassMark direct compute score | ||
Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,146.53 frames/s | vs | 777.36 frames/s | More than 45% better ocean surface simulation score |